CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE USE OF MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES IN PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONSMADDEN LV; KNOKE JK; LOUIE R et al.1982; PHYTOPATHOLOGY; ISSN 0031-949X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 72; NO 8; PP. 1015-1017; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS FOR COMPARING TREATMENTS WITH A CONTROL: GENERAL THEORYBECHOFER RE; TAMEHANE AC.1981; TECHNOMETRICS; ISSN 0040-1706; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 23; NO 1; PP. 45-57; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES IN THE ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCEBRYANT JL; BRUVOLD NT.1980; J. AM. STAT. ASSOC.; ISSN 0003-1291; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 75; NO 372; PP. 874-880; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

CRITICAL VALUES FOR NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE COMPARISONSSILVERSTEIN AB.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 44-46; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

THE COMPARISON OF SEVERAL RESPONSE FUNCTIONS WITH A STANDARD.JENSEN DR.1976; BIOMETRICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 51-59; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

PAIRWISE MULTIPLE COMPARISONS IN THE HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE, UNEQUAL SAMPLE SIZE CASEDUNNETT CW.1980; J. AM. STAT. ASSOC.; ISSN 0003-1291; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 75; NO 372; PP. 789-795; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

MISCLASSIFICATION PROBABILITIES IN 2³ FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTSBOHRER R; SHEFT J.1979; J. STATIST. PLANNG INFER.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 3; NO 1; PP. 79-84; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE DATA BY AKAIKE'S INFORMATION CRITERION AND THE FINITE CORRECTIONS.SUGIURA N.1978; COMMUNIC. STATIST., THEORY METHODS; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 13-26; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS FOR COMPARING TREATMENTS WITH A CONTROL: TABLES OF OPTIMAL ALLOCATIONS OF OBSERVATIONSBECHHOFER RE; TAMHANE AC.1983; TECHNOMETRICS; ISSN 0040-1706; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 25; NO 1; PP. 87-95; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A REVIEW OF SIMULTANEOUS PAIRWISE MULTIPLE COMPARISONSGAMES PA; KESELMAN HJ; ROGAN JC et al.1983; STATISTICA NEERLANDICA; ISSN 0039-0402; NLD; DA. 1983; VOL. 37; NO 2; PP. 53-58; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

A GENERAL METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE INTERVALSRICHMOND J.1982; J. AM. STAT. ASSOC.; ISSN 503568; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 77; NO 378; PP. 455-460; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

PAIRWISE MULTIPLE COMPARISONS IN THE UNEQUAL VARIANCE CASEDUNNETT CW.1980; J. AM. STAT. ASSOC.; ISSN 0003-1291; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 75; NO 372; PP. 796-800; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES FOR MULTIPLE COMPARISONS OF MEANS WITH UNEQUAL VARIANCESTAMHANE AC.1979; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 74; NO 366 PART. 1; PP. 471-480; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

DEVELOPMENTS IN MULTIPLE COMPARISONS. 1966-1976.MILLER RG JR.1977; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 72; NO 360; PP. 779-788; BIBL. 6 P.Article

A NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE TEST WITH A PRIORI NATUREMAGER PP.1977; BIOMETR. J.; DDR; DA. 1977; VOL. 19; NO 4; PP. 303-306; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

UNEQUAL PRECISION MULTIPLE COMPARISONS FOR RANDOMIZED BLOCK DESIGNS UNDER NONSTANDARD CONDITIONS.MUDHOLKAR GS; SUBBAIAH P.1976; J. AMER. STATIST. ASSOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 71; NO 354; PP. 429-434; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

ROBUST MULTIPLE COMPARISONSRINGLAND JT.1983; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION; ISSN 0162-1459; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 78; NO 381; PP. 145-151; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SOME MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES WITH UNEQUAL VARIANCESKORHONEN MP.1982; SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS; ISSN 0303-6898; SWE; DA. 1982; VOL. 9; NO 4; PP. 241-247; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

OPTIMUM SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS FOR MULTISTAGE COMPARISON PROCEDURESLEHMANN EL; SHAFFER JP.1979; ANN. STATIST.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 27-45; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITHIN ANOVA USING ORTHOGONAL OR NONORTHOGONAL COMPONENTSGAITO J.1978; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 38; NO 4; PP. 901-904; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

ON IMPROVED EXTENSIONS OF THE T-METHOD OF MULTIPLE COMPARISONS FOR UNBALANCED DESIGNGENIZI A; HOCHBERG Y.1978; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 73; NO 364; PP. 879-884; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

MULTIPLE COMPARISONS OF MEANS WHEN VARIANCE IS NOT HOMOGENEOUS.GILL JL.1977; J. DAIRY SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 60; NO 3; PP. 444-449; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

EFFICIENCY OF REPEATED MEASURES DESIGNS VERSUS COMPLETELY RANDOMIZED DESIGNS BASED ON MULTIPLE COMPARISONSVONESH EF.1983; COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS. THEORY AND METHODS; ISSN 0361-0926; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 12; NO 3; PP. 289-301; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

PLOTS OF P-VALUES TO EVALUATE MANY TESTS SIMULTANEOUSLYSCHWEDER T; SPJOTVOLL E.1982; BIOMETRIKA; ISSN 0006-3444; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 69; NO 3; PP. 493-502; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

TABLES OF PERCENTAGE POINTS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE VALUE OF EQUALLY CORRELATED NORMAL RANDOM VARIABLESODEH RE.1982; COMMUN. STAT., SIMUL. COMPUT.; ISSN 0361-0918; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 65-87; BIBL. 9 REF.Article